Obvious? Why did it take so long?
How can an idea be rejected as obvious based on old underlying citations? The Leo Pharmaceuticals case suggests new ways to overcome obviousness rejections.
Stephen E. Zweig, PhD JD, Patent Attorney
How can an idea be rejected as obvious based on old underlying citations? The Leo Pharmaceuticals case suggests new ways to overcome obviousness rejections.
The USPTO can combine an absurdly large number of citations in obviousness rejections. The reasoning for this is based on a now obsolete court decision.
Discussion of the original Federal Circuit decision in CLS Bank v. Alice Corporation.
Discussion of Mayo vs. Prometheus case, where SCOTUS showed that they do not have a clue about science, technology, and patent law.
The fast (<1 year) USPTO Track 1 prioritized exam costs $2070 extra. It must be elected on initial filing, and all paperwork must be in order at that time.
The US is now on the AIA first (inventor) to file system. Inventors must now “race to the patent office”. Consider filing multiple provisional patents.